(I’m re-posting this video for educational purposes, in accordance with ‘fair use’ provisions in the copyright act; this blog is not monetized)
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
An Atheist in Adelaide 
Not only did the perpetrators of 9/11 turn the towers into dust with a form of directed energy, they also used another form of directed energy, the Internet, to turn the truth into dust as well…
AE911Truth vs Dr. Judy Wood
IF YOU FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE, AND IN ALL PROBABILITY, RICHARD GAGE AND ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH IS A GOVERNMENT FUNDED DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN MEANT TO MOLD PUBLIC OPINION USING A TAX-EXEMPT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION AS ITS COVER.
“When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest.” – Amicus Solo (Latin for “a lone friend”)
If Richard Gage is using AE911Ttruth’s funds to buy Dr. Wood’s book, and Richard Gage is suppressing Dr. Wood’s work, one must conclude that the prime directive of AE911Truth is to suppress the evidence. Mr. Gage cannot refute the overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Wood’s book but only misrepresent it (i.e. promote disinformation about it). Science is not determined by popular opinion, but a psyop is. Referring to the sum of 2+3 as “a view” or as “an opinion” or “a theory” is how cover-ups work. It creates doubt where there is no doubt. Humanity has awoken. Those who are worthy and willing to open their eyes to the truth will read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood.
Richard Gage and other Liars for 9/11 Truth
http://tinyurl.com/911liars
Image of check from Richard Gage for Dr. Judy Wood Book
FOR THOSE WHO ARE WORTHY AND WILLING TO FIND THE TRUTH, IT WILL ALWAYS FIND THEM.
Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Part I Summary, 1.) mission statement
Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate (some) scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, (not all 7, just 3 of the buildings) calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice. (Except Dr. Judy Wood)
Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Schedule A, Part II, Section A
from 2008 to 2012 AE911Truth income was $1.365 million!!!
Click to access AE911%20Tax%20Return%20-%2026-1532493_990_201212.pdf
If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American people by claiming to present the best “scientific forensic evidence”, only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.
Theory, speculation, and belief are not necessary to understand that a type of directed energy was used on 9/11, rather, only detailed study of the empirical evidence from 9/11 is necessary. Situations like this are rare in science, where there is so much empirical evidence that one can bypass theory and speculation to draw an irrefutable conclusion from the evidence. This also helps to illustrate a major difference between Dr. Judy Wood and other 9/11 researchers, as she did not start with theory or speculation and then begin researching to see if it was consistent with the evidence. Instead, Dr. Wood simply did what any objective, vigilant scientist would do, she gathered and studied as much of the empirical evidence from 9/11 as possible, assembling a monumental database of verifiable physical evidence that dwarfs the efforts of any other 9/11 “research”, including the unscientific ‘9/11 Commission Report’. After gathering and studying all of this important evidence, Dr. Wood arrived at the only logical, inescapable conclusion that explains all of this empirical evidence, a general category of weapon technology known as ‘directed energy weapons’ (DEW). It would be theory or speculation to go beyond that by trying to name a specific weapon technology or location, because that is not what the evidence allows us to irrefutably conclude. This is why the term is left as a general one, because that is the only logical, conclusive, and irrefutable conclusion that the evidence allows us to make.
This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.
Click to access Where%20Did%20The%20Towers%20Go%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood.pdf
Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book can give at least 10 reasons that rule out the theory by “AE911trutherd” that welding material destroyed the WTC. How many can you list ? Hint: the bottom of page 45, the top of page 171, the diagrams on page 81 and 84, the diagram at the bottom of page 11, and of course pages 122 to 127. The list is endless, actually.
By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.
>Bombs don’t do that.
>Thermite does not do that.
>Thermate does not do that.
>Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
>Nano-thermite does not do that.
>New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
>Firecrackers do not do that.
>Fire does not do that.
>Nukes do not do that.
>Megga nukes do not do that.
>Milli-nukes do not do that.
>Mini-nukes do not do that.
>Nano-nukes cannot do that.
>A wrecking ball cannot do that.
>A slingshot cannot do that.
>Missiles cannot do that.
We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and/or Thermal Energy and we know that the “dustification” was done without Kinetic Energy and without Thermal Energy. That is, “dustification” was not done with high heat (Thermal Energy) nor with some form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings nor did Thermal Energy Weapons (TEW) destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow (and controlled within fairly precise boundaries) to cause the building to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy that was used as a weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat (fire, welding materials such as thermite) and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, or many micro hammers)
If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with “free energy” (i.e. “off the grid”). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood’s book you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing “free energy” (“off the grid”) exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that “free-energy technology” exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood’s research.
Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing between the two false choices of “9/11 Truthers” verses “The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory” while ignoring the facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence. (Chanting “9/11 Was An Inside Job!” is equivalent to chanting “Yes To Fascism!”)
Richard Gage is NOT a qualified forensic scientist. Dr. Judy Wood IS a qualified forensic scientist. AE911Truth is calling for a new investigation. This implies an admission that they are NOT qualified to conduct such an investigation of what happened. Otherwise, why are they calling for a new investigation instead of conducting one themselves — unless the intention is to knowingly distract its members and others away from the new investigation that has already been conducted? AE911Truth wants a new investigation? They already have one. It’s contained in a book called “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” Why is AE911Truth suppressing it? AE911Truth cannot lobby Congress. They are a 501( c )3 and are prohibited from lobbying Congress. Why didn’t AE911Truth submit their so-called “thermite evidence” to NIST? – Oh, that’s right. It’s a federal crime to defraud the government. Why hasn’t AE911Truth filed a Federal qui tam case? Because they haven’t blown the whistle on anything and they have no evidence and it is past the statute of limitation. So, why didn’t they support Dr. Wood’s Federal qui tam case that was filed instead of banning members who mentioned it? * — I guess they really didn’t want such a case to go forward. So they want “respect and compassion for all people” except for those named “Dr. Judy Wood.”
AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control” ? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. ** Since Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood is a teacher and promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.
The scientific method, as it came into being during the Enlightenment period, is a method of thought known as empiricism or as the empirical method. Under the terms of empiricism, all conclusions are, must, and can be drawn from observable evidence and from observable evidence only. Evidence must precede any and every conclusion to be drawn from it. Then, if sound logic governs in the relationship between evidence and the conclusion drawn from it, that conclusion will be irrefutable
Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.
This is why Dr. Wood’s work is irrefutable. She only presents evidence and an analysis of that evidence. There is no use for a theory in forensic science. Either you know something or you don’t. That is why those in charge of a cover up don’t want people to look at the evidence in Dr. Wood’s book. Dr. Wood does not ask you to believe her. She only wants you to believe yourself and think for yourself and look at the evidence yourself and not argue about opinions of theories of speculation of ideas. That is what keeps a cover up in place. Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book know this to be true.
On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining ‘why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,’ the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood’s disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.
Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry.
She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers in her areas of expertise. In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood’s investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain.
*Chapter 31. AE911 “Truth” and Other Sites Again Censor The Evidence 04 Apr 2010
AE911 – Silently Deletes A Petition Signer (pages 297 to 300) of 9/11Finding the Truth – A Compilation of Articles by Andrew Johnson Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood
Click to access 9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
**In Appendix C, page 238, section C, (Refined searches) of Michael Armenia’s book, “Nanomanagement:The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation”, the name “Judy Wood” is a search term used to disqualify a person’s affiliation with AE911Truth.
Field Interference 013 AE911Truth: A Failure By Design
We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything; including the stuff that nobody was supposed to see.
http://healthwyze.org/index.php/component/content/article/590-the-shaky-moral-foundation-that-ae911truth-is-built-upon.html
Richard Gage and AE911Truth sleep in the same bed with convicted sex offenders?
Manuel (Manny) Badillo from the conference “Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time,” held March 26, 2011
https://web.archive.org/web/20150318144035/https://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=80147
US Marine John P DiMatale speaks at Rethink911 Times Square Event 9-11-13
https://web.archive.org/web/20131020073238/http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=65694
Wake up sheeple. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Big Brother only has as much power as you grant him. Independent thought is powerful. After reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, Charlie Pound of the U. K. produced the song WAKE UP THIS YOUR ALARM! Unless you enjoy being fleeced, leave the opinion herd and read Dr. Wood’s book too. It has been over 13 years since a secret technology was used to create terror and mass murder for the sake of imperialism and hegemony based on a fiat money system in its death throes. What are we as a people left with? A published scientific forensic investigation that concludes a type of Directed Energy that was used as a weapon “dustified” the World Trade Center complex and a group of shadowy people determined to suppress that evidence by any means. This is the sad reality that we live in. Wake up!
© 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound
BTW…Those who ridicule and marginalize Dr. Judy Wood are promoting the fascist police state that Edward Joseph “Ed” Snowden is alerting us to…
Fascism Anyone?
Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a constitutional republic with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not. (Remember that fascist regimes have elections too. Covering it up with a red, white, and blue sticker doesn’t make fascism any less despicable. When are people going to wake up and start using the “F” word?)
https://web.archive.org/web/20030603193129/http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/britt_23_2.htm
LikeLike
Phew! What a mountain of info to chew through and absorb… Gonna take me a little while to read and digest, but hello to you, Emmanuel Goldstein, and welcome to ‘An Atheist in Adelaide’…
I must say I admire your passion for this topic, and, though I’ve only skimmed your post so far (will read it more fully later and get back to you!) I find myself in agreement with much that you say about the superiority of Ms Wood’s argument, which is impressively logical.
At the moment, however, I have one problem with the notion that the 911 Truth organization, however ‘profitable’ (let’s face it, they’re gonna need HEAPS for lawyers!) is a ‘government funded disinformation organization’:
Why would the government set up ANY ‘disinformation’ organization which, let’s face it, points the finger right back at them? And whose explanation, which is also impressively logical and evidence-based, is that 9/11 WAS an inside job?
Of that much I’m certain, however it was accomplished. I can’t help but think about the videos and audio of rapid, multiple explosions, and the squibs which are evidence of explosives… perhaps a DEW would create similar physical events and sounds…? And it should be obvious, too, (even to the good Dr Judy Wood herself!) that, whilst it is true that the twin towers WERE ‘dustified’, this was NOT true of WTC7, which fell in the manner expected by a classic ‘controlled demolition’… and the evidence from Larry Silverstein’s own mouth “Pull it!” also supports the FACT that this WAS a controlled demolition… So at this point I can’t help but wonder if perhaps the answer, as old Abe Simpson (‘Grandpa Simpson’) might put it, is “… a little from column ‘a’; a little from column ‘b’…
Once again, welcome to ‘An Atheist in Adelaide’… I look forward to continuing our discussion after I’ve had a chance to read through your post more thoroughly…
Asty
LikeLike
I understand your state of confusion. This is how cover-up operations work. By reading Dr. Wood’s book and not paying any attention to what is parroted on the Internet all of your questions will be answered and your critical thinking skills will be honed. The evidence speaks for itself. Thank you Dr. Wood.
LikeLike
Hi Emmanuel…
I think I’ve heard enough of Judy Wood’s ideas already and so don’t need to buy the book as I am already largely persuaded by her argument… but I don’t mind you giving her book a free plug on this page…
I’d agree that a DEW was used on the Twin Towers which were visibly ‘dustified’ to use Dr Wood’s own word for the phenomenon… But I’m also equally convinced that WTC 7 was a classic ‘controlled demolition’.
And even in the destruction of the twin towers, explosions (and ‘squibs’) WERE visible, AND audible… though these seemed to me quite unlike a classic ‘controlled demolition’, as these started at or near the top and seemed to work their way downwards, at the same time as the concrete etc was dustified… but there was still very much of the ‘controlled demolition’ in the destruction of these towers too.
I’d also agree that in her search for the nature of the DEW involved, she’s on the right track with the Hutchison Effect(s)… It does seem very much like Tesla’s technology… though I find myself considerably less than as elated than Dr Wood herself seemed to be by the prospect… Free energy is one possibility of such technology… the ‘Death Ray’ and HAARP are others! (Now THERE’s a likely candidate for the 911 culprit!)
However, Judy Wood, though she explains the dustification process and what that would require very well, doesn’t explain how a DEW cut all the girders into neat 30-ft sections… just the right size to go on the trucks that took them away to be shipped off to China to be melted down before anyone could examine the evidence they represented!
So I think it is unwise to ‘throw the baby out with the bathwater’ by dispensing altogether with the ‘controlled demolition’ theory, which imho, is an adequate explanation of WTC7 in and of itself, and perhaps a necessary partial explanation of the twin towers too…
I would suggest that perhaps Dr Wood and Richard Gage ought to be working together rather than in opposition to each other. Perhaps explosives PLUS a DEW were necessary to do everything that was done to those towers on 9/11… (that NEEDED to be done to them, in order to make sure a lot of other ‘evidence’ for a LOT of other crimes was also ‘dustified’ at the same time!)
The real question now, of course, is this: Now we know it was most certainly an inside job, WHO in the world is likely to have this kind of directed energy weapon AND the power to use even the POTUS as a patsy (when they announced the second plane in that school, the CIA hung him out to dry! I’m sure it was a warning to him!)
Imho, the evidence points to the MIC and the dual-citizenship Israeli banksters who not only own the vast bulk of this complex, but who also run the federal reserve Ponzi scheme and get the US Army to fight all Israel’s wars for her… covertly, of course!
Rothshchild Zionists are ultimately behind it all… right at the apex of the predator-pyramid… of their NWO… and if the CIA or the MIC have such Directed Energy Weapons, you can bet your boots that Israel does too…
LikeLike
You are making assumptions that Internet rumors are scientific evidence. This is why I do not piecemeal debate (ODD obsessive debunking disorder) disinformation because it prevents one from discussing the real evidence. If you are interested in the truth you will read Dr. Wood’s book. If you are not interested in the truth, continue to believe hearsay and DO NOT READ DR. WOOD’S BOOK! It’s that simple. The choice is yours.
LikeLike
I dislike being given the ‘hard sell’… Who are you anyway, her agent? Or just a salesman on commission…?
I might read her book if I can find it in my local library… but I’m certainly not going to buy any book just ’cause someone on the ‘net tells me to…
Btw, I don’t make any such assumptions; the evidence given by the Architects and Engineers may not provide a complete explanation, but then again neither does the DEW theory… and the A&E evidence most certainly IS scientific… Last time I heard engineering was a science wasn’t it?
Now you have two choices: You can either continue to put people off reading Judy Wood’s book by arrogantly giving them the hard sell… and just pissing them off… or you can allow them to watch the videos and make up their own minds about whether or not they need to buy the book… the choice is yours…
But continue to give ME the hard sell and I shall put your comments in the spam box, where I’m beginning to think they belong.
If Judy Wood hired you to do her PR for her, she didn’t half pick the wrong person!
LikeLike